On 03/24/2014 12:48 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 03/22/2014 07:51 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> On 03/19/2014 10:59 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:>>
>>>> And JDK5 might be good enough for the use required. It doesn't claim
>>>> to be anything more than that, so I don't see the harm in leaving it
>>> Speaking as the upstream maintainer, I do.
>> Hi Andrew, can you be a little more specific about the potential harm
>> you see with keeping GCJ in Fedora?
> I think Rahul already answered this. Do you expect me to
> say something different from him?
Well, speaking of "harm", yes, I do.
Don't take me wrong. I just want to know if there is any reason beyond
maintainer unwillingness/ lack of time.
No, I don't think there is, beyond the usual objections to leaving
packages to rot.