-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 04/11/2011 12:54 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Rahul Sundaram
<metherid(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 04/11/2011 04:02 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Now that Vala 0.12 is out, Renich has inquired whether we can update the
>> F-14 package.
>>
>> I wouldn't push an update unless all packages that require Valencia can
>> be built against 0.12 without a major update -- F-14, after all, is a
>> stable release -- so if possible, would the package maintainers let me
>> know if this is currently possible?
>
> Why is this update a benefit for Fedora 14? Does it break any
> compatibility? Have you done any testing with the affected packages?
With the question of "would the package maintainers let me know if
this is currently possible?" my guess would be no, but then it was a
question.
As Peter said; as for shotwell and xnoise, there are updates that
actually require a newer Vala that can be pushed to F-14 if Vala is
updated, and Renich asked because, likewise, a synapse update requires
the new Vala.
Most shotwell ABRT bugs seem to be not due to shotwell itself, but due
to a dependent library; and another of my package, gedit-vala, would
need to be updated to a snapshot to support Vala 0.12. So personally, I
can go either way on this, but would like to hear if other maintainers
prefer to go ahead or not.
Thanks,
- --
Michel Alexandre Salim
Fedora Project Contributor:
http://fedoraproject.org/
Email: salimma(a)fedoraproject.org | GPG key ID: 78884778
Jabber: hircus(a)jabber.ccc.de | IRC: hircus(a)irc.freenode.net
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\
www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk2i41MACgkQNd069XiIR3jVNwCeKrlnP2OgUdv7TWP6ten4g/AJ
mi8AniomPooI0V23AdQdIPkCJx4tBdCt
=akMP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----