On 07/26/2014 07:17 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:01:33 -0600
Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 22:03:30 +0800
> Christopher Meng <cickumqt(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> My opinion is, you should only comaintain what you want, not take
>> over other's packages.
>>
>> If FESCo member could give consent of adding someone as an admin(not
>> the point of the contact) of a package instead of orphaning lots of
>> packages, that will be helpful.
> The plan is to orphan the packages, but leave the old point of contact
> with acls. That way someone active can take over the package, but if
> the old point of contact comes back they can just join right back in.
>
> This way the package gets active folks caring for it and the former
> point of contact can come back anytime.
Sorry for the long delay here. ;( There was a issue with the pkgdb2 api
to do this, then I was traveling, etc.
It's now been done.
The following packages are looking for a new point of contact on at
least one branch:
(Note that many of them have co-maintainers, so do check with them to
see if any of them would like to become the new point of contact):
atlas
babl
bibletime
cln
clucene
exaile
exempi taken
exempi
galternatives
gegl
gparted
grads
libctl
libibverbs
libmlx4
libmthca
libqalculate
mpich
mpich2
nautilus-actions
ncview
netcdf
o3read
qalculate-gtk
qalculate-kde
scotch
screenruler
strigi
sword
texmaker
tokyocabinet
tracker
wiggle
xcompmgr
xesam-tools
xiphos
zeitgeist
zeitgeist-datahub
kevin
--
Jan Chaloupka
------------------------------
* Software Engineer *
* ENG Base Operating Systems *
* Red Hat Czech, s. r. o. *
* UTC+1 (CET), jchaloup *