https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/pguiman
Maintainer "odvorace" gives "user unknown" at Red Hat. Pkg ACLs are locked down.
Michael Schwendt píše v Čt 28. 08. 2008 v 21:56 +0200:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/pguiman
Maintainer "odvorace" gives "user unknown" at Red Hat. Pkg ACLs are locked down.
The upstream at SF.net (author = maintainer) looks dead too, last commit was 11 month ago.
Dan
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:56:41 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/pguiman
Maintainer "odvorace" gives "user unknown" at Red Hat. Pkg ACLs are locked down.
Who takes care of issues like this? Is it necessary to follow the lengthy AWOL procedure? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/468160
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:24:16PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:56:41 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/pguiman
Maintainer "odvorace" gives "user unknown" at Red Hat. Pkg ACLs are locked down.
Who takes care of issues like this? Is it necessary to follow the lengthy AWOL procedure? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/468160
If the mail of the user is not known anymore first steps can be skipped.
-- Pat
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:56:41 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/pguiman
Maintainer "odvorace" gives "user unknown" at Red Hat. Pkg ACLs are locked down.
Who takes care of issues like this? Is it necessary to follow the lengthy AWOL procedure? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/468160
I've opened the acl.
Would FESCo like to short circuit the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy in this case? It seems like most of the steps in the procedure have been followed except that the opening of the bugzilla bug was done last instead of first.
-Toshio
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:51:23 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/pguiman
Maintainer "odvorace" gives "user unknown" at Red Hat. Pkg ACLs are locked down.
Who takes care of issues like this? Is it necessary to follow the lengthy AWOL procedure? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/468160
I've opened the acl.
Would FESCo like to short circuit the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy in this case? It seems like most of the steps in the procedure have been followed except that the opening of the bugzilla bug was done last instead of first.
I didn't start any formal process. This is only one of a few packages where I stumbled into locked ACLs while fixing lots of unowned directories. Mailing the owner then failed.
There's another open ticket which is unanswered for several months. The app crashes and possibly doesn't work much, given that it's only 0.0.1.
The missing packager is also the upstream developer.
Short circuiting is fine here since maintainer was @redhat and mail bounces and user didn't update their FAS acct and no other contact method is known.
This counts as a +1 from a FESCo member, sorry for the top post, I'm out right now.
On 10/23/08, Michael Schwendt mschwendt@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:51:23 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/pguiman
Maintainer "odvorace" gives "user unknown" at Red Hat. Pkg ACLs are locked down.
Who takes care of issues like this? Is it necessary to follow the lengthy AWOL procedure? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/468160
I've opened the acl.
Would FESCo like to short circuit the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy in this case? It seems like most of the steps in the procedure have been followed except that the opening of the bugzilla bug was done last instead of first.
I didn't start any formal process. This is only one of a few packages where I stumbled into locked ACLs while fixing lots of unowned directories. Mailing the owner then failed.
There's another open ticket which is unanswered for several months. The app crashes and possibly doesn't work much, given that it's only 0.0.1.
The missing packager is also the upstream developer.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list