-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/20/2014 11:59 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> I wonder whether it wouldn't be time to say goodbye to
> tcpwrappers in Fedora.
I'd be happy to see those go.
Those who depend on it though, should see some "failed closed"
behaviour, so their service does not suddenly become more exposed.
Paul
Yeah I am not sure you are going to be able to make a totally clean
cut, there are some of us out there who still use this and it works,
despite however much crap it is underneath the covers.
A fail closed would be a decent first step, but as I said dropping it
altogether without some mitigation would be a bad move I believe.
Just my two cents,
- -Erinn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTKy9KAAoJEFg7BmJL2iPOqhgH/AxzMlqVHGn2p2GBHkVsvDCY
jjtA7/GDiWWHaOWykKIPFsxu+SiULux1JbcIop0qIsWsb8wbeQjrC/9tMIpRPb5n
Zsx3Zpk4YfWabEjSuhSjIYBqkbhh/5OQNYHLmeaTMR6rd8/N9MMrwlrxBjRtSLlG
ghxQ3BcqCdVR4hdFdBGkaTi1MXxjxcXVpcoOK/1vU63r9VeTz0UMGpC7heXA3d1O
4cuFY2D9zvu4y78UEC8RqM/p4pv3b6dAmNmatAilc4tiCUgQUt03n2K1TUVctsc0
zvDmx+bFeu6A8RnRNGddkvSKrv/qG96qKHucQ1tLCNvcZ1sdeLkMvurSeq+Pdkw=
=/0ol
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----