On Sun, 2 May 2004, ByteEnable wrote:
> Which .la files? Whatever library it is that actually needed
libselinux
> should probably get a dependency added in its -devel subpackage.
>
> Jeremy
libfam.la
librpmbuild.la
librpm.la
I would argue that a better fix would be to modify the packages above to
strip all references of libselinux from their .la files or possibly
remove the .la files altogether (if they're not absolutely needed)
-- Rex