On Monday, February 10, 2020 12:03:25 PM MST Robbie Harwood wrote:
"John M. Harris Jr" <johnmh(a)splentity.com> writes:
> On Saturday, January 25, 2020 2:52:05 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Question and (pre)proposal:
>>
>> Can Fedora converge on a single swap-on-ZRAM implementation, and if
>> so, which one? Fedora Workstation WG wants to move to swap-on-ZRAM by
>> default in Fedora 33, and the working group needs to pick something
>> soon.
>
> Using swap on zram disables the ability to hibernate, making it a
> non-starter for many users. If this is going to be thrown into
> anything, the user needs to be asked whether they want it or not in
> the installer, otherwise you're just taking away features.
I thought you told me that the workstation group considers hibernation
unsupported? (id:2368390.zU9c8gpsLA@marvin.jharris.pw)
Thanks,
--Robbie
They do, but that doesn't negate the fact that it is actually supported (you
can hibernate your system), and using swap on zram outright breaks hibernation
(for obvious reasons).
--
John M. Harris, Jr.
Splentity