On 05/29/2009 04:12 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
What are you trying to point out? It doesn't become clear to me.
The name
of the package you refer to might be a pun or a tongue-in-cheek reference,
but other than that it's a set of tools (a proxy and tools) that can be
used together with arbitrary image gallery web-sites [1]. Is the package
name considered a problem already
I don't personally consider it as a problem but I don't know whether
others would. The point is that there is no rigid line that applies to
everyone if we want to argue exclusion of a package based on morals. The
legal line - we trust Red Hat Legal on that. So there is less debate
based on that.
Rahul