Shouldn't this one replace 3). As if there are no alternatives, priorities are
meaningless.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jiri Vanek" <jvanek(a)redhat.com>
To: devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 1:42:53 PM
Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in
Fedora
On 02/27/2015 12:04 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 02/27/2015 10:47 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
>
>> If we want to be sure that this legacy jdk will not interfere with
>> the system JDK let it not provide anything via alternatives. That
>> way people that want it can use it by playing with PATH/JAVA_HOME
>> (just like they do with other JVMs).
>
> That's right.
>
In that case, to add another rule - " 8) all alternatives bindings must be
removed" - must be added.
J.
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct