-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2014 04:18 PM, Derek Pressnall wrote:
I have a question about contributing a package to Fedora. Is it
common for the author of an open source package to act as package
maintainer? Or is it better to have someone else be the package
maintainer (who is more experienced with the Fedora build
processes)? I'm the author of a backup utility which fills a niche
between tools based on rsync, and the heavy-weight full featured
backup tools, which I think would be a good fit for a typical
Fedora user. I already have an SRPM available on the Github
project site (
www.snebu.com <
http://www.snebu.com>), but it may
need a bit more work to get it in line with the Fedora build
system. I've also been reading through the package maintainer
guidelines, and am willing to go through the process too, if
needed. I have already created my Fedora and Bugzilla accounts,
and will spin up Koji this weekend to play with.
Thanks,
--Derek
I'd say the best person to act as package maintainer is always the
person who is most interested in doing so. We have many maintainers in
Fedora who are upstream developers, as well as many that are
interested downstream users.
The Fedora packaging process can be a bit tricky the first time
around; I'd recommend locating a member of the Fedora Sponsors who is
interested in helping you with your first package and showing you the
ropes.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlPW8ZMACgkQeiVVYja6o6PE1gCdEKXHNyS1FZKt42qIWtvQ3KUk
Wo8AnjN55HEYzsXacwAkU5frL3TUjl3b
=Q3Ye
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----