On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Mathieu Bridon <bochecha@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Saturday, October 05, 2013 11:29 AM, "Jóhann B. Guğmundsson" wrote:
Did you look at the history who signed up to the WG page before it even
got announced to the community?

Who? People who were at Flock and/or had read the meeting logs and knew about the WG about to be announced.

I knew about that page before it was announced.

And I don't work for Red Hat, I just happen to read the FESCo meeting logs every week.


Want to take this further shall we start pointing out individuals that
Red Hat invented job positions for within our communities then planted
individuals outside the community in those positions to satisify it's
compulseve corporate need for control?

So every time you say that, I can't help thinking you're just jealous they took someone « outside the community » instead of you.

It might not be what you're thinking, but it's really how you sound.

Maybe those « individuals » are just more competent? Or you know, maybe Red Hat prefers hiring people who don't spend their time vomiting their hatred on mailing-lists?

It sounds like this is an issue from way back from the tone of this email.
 
Come on guys we cant keep going back and forth on this.  find it sad that we are.
My opinion is this. 
we get funding from these guys. So to some extent I think they ca put in engineers to assist us when they see a feature that they want in.
I am not commenting on the methods they use.
This is because I actually do not care.

It is open source. Unhappy with something, just fork it and move on. That is the beauty of it.
No one will come after you cause that is the beauty of the whole thing.

I think we also need to look at deliverables. I  usually am not the person looking at the small details.
For me it is more of deliver and we are all good.
I mean if this needs to be revised I am sure we can have a look at it and ask them to change it for the community.

this is just my $0.02

thanks.

--
Mathieu