On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 02:39:56PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 01/31/2013 02:04 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>And it's the same situation as with MariaDB and MySQL. Fedora is going to
>prefer MariaDB (FESCo stated it clearly yesterday) - so we should try to make
>an effort to support MariaDB and not for example force users to use both just
>to run system. But on the other hand - if there's someone (and both are from
>upstream), who's going to take a burden of maintainance - why not? It can
>fail, they will loose interest one day - yes, could happen. And there's
>possibility that these projects even coming from same roots will diverge and
>become totally different projects...
"Fedora is going to prefer MariaDB (FESCo stated it clearly yesterday)"
It did now? If that's the case then I would like a full fledge
statement from FESCO saying so and a discussion what is supposed to
be the distribution "default" database and promote postgresql as an
candidate to take that part thus leaving our users out of yet
another sunacle fiasco...
If you want to argue about MariaDB, could you please start another
thread? It is totally irrelevant in the context of this thread.