----- Original Message -----
On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 10:07 -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> That’s the right thing to do of course, but leaves the users with an
> unusable system in the mean time. Could the update description at
> least generally point to how to work around this if the certificate
> owner is not (sufficiently quickly) responsive?
I'd expect that users would be blocked from using just one application,
Isn’t that enough? Imagine Fedora contributors being blocked from using “just” koji :)
A general workaround is to downgrade to the previous package version,
you think we need to state that explicitly in the update description?
Well, it’s not a _long-term_ workaround but it does resolve the way I have worded the
issue, where everyone involved wants to upgrade the certificate and only the timing isn’t
right. Fair enough.