On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 17:47, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le ven 31/10/2003 à 15:31, Warren Togami a écrit :
> Mike A. Harris wrote:
> > Ick. Underscores in version/release are hideous IMHO. I'd use
> > "." instead of "_". Your comment at the top of this
> > indicates a ".", so perhaps you just made a typo, and sequence of
> > cut and paste errors? ;o)
> Oops. Yeah, fedora.us original plan was ".", however some here on
> fedora-devel-list argued toward "_" as a more clear separator between
> the patchlevel and disttag because it can be confusing with so many "."
> I personally actually prefer the "." separator, but I really don't
> which is chosen.
For the record, I think underscores are hideous too.
That makes it three people that commented on this:)
Heh, why not make it @ .. it sorta even has a meaning "foo-1.2.3 at
(==for) RHL 9": foobar-1.2.3-1(a)0.9.i386.rpm. Looks lovely doesn't it :)
<ducks and runs>
- Panu -