On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:50:40PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 09:35 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> So I think the gnome-scan interface is nice but if my results are
> reproduced by others, we can't really replace xsane with it until it's a
> bit less buggy. It would be nice if any coders with scanning interest
> could contribute to the code I guess (I'm unfortunately not a coder).
IMO the obnoxious license dialog that xsane still subjects you to is
sufficient reason already to replace it. We don't tolerate dialogs like
that in other default-installed components...
Why don't we patch it out then....
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|