On Friday 07 November 2003 08:47, Axel Thimm wrote:
While I personally support this scheme, I was under the impression
that there were more people against enforcing rpm upgrades for
minimally changes (e.g. fedora-legacy should only provide security
related errata). Especially because RH itself did not issue errata
for rpm despite the known problems.
In fact, Warren, I believe we were the only two supporting rpm
upgrades, so unless we are the only left subscribers of
fedora-legacy, it is not yet an agreement of the whole list. ;)
I personally agreed to it, until somebody showed me clear evidence that
it could/would break something.
Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE (geek.j2solutions.net
Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy
Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org
GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub
Was I helpful? Let others know: