> <sarcasm>
> So what is the next step? Offering another kernel? Or allowing us to choose
> a different package manager or packing format? Oh, wait, using multiple
> different depsolvers has already been frowned upon.
>
> Now why did *that* happen? It is Fedora, isn't it?
> </sarcasm>
>
Sarcasm isn't going to resolve the problems.
But it might highlight the problem with this "lets have some more choices"
madness.
If you have a proposal,
let's hear it. Removing all the alternatives isn't an option. Is it?
You already heard it: "don't make it worse than it already is".
Users don't care where LO comes from at all.
Then how will you empower them to make a choice between LO and AOO? How will
you ensure that bugs don't get misfiled?
Every now and then I get bugs arising out of forks and downstream patches that
get misfiled by confused users.
Cheers,
Debarshi
--
If computers are going to revolutionize education, then steam engines and cars
and electricity would have done it too. -- Arjun Shankar