On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 03:39:41PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
It would be interesting to analyse all those things, not to plan an
rpm
replacement, but to actually fix the things upstreams are not happy
about (and, a lot of time, those won't involve rpm, and when they do
involve rpm fixing rpm will be easier than rewriting it from scratch).
I can get behind this approach.
To make it work we need to look at the things where 1) upstreams are not
happy and 2) we can provide value for both dev and ops.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader