2009/1/2 Paul W. Frields <stickster(a)gmail.com>:
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 05:33:43PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:09:56 -0500, Paul wrote:
> > I'd like to arrange for some sort of reward for the top 10 reviewers.
> > We could turn that into an annual event.
> What are your plans on avoiding "quantity instead of quality" effects?
How does the packaging community currently ensure that packages
reviewed are of sufficient quality?
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
- - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
My thoughts on this is that as we progress further down the food chain
the reviews are more likely to be in a quantity vs quality battle. In
fact with these stats when someone all of a sudden jumps up they might
then get a few looks at there reviews. Another thought would be to
each month or two have the sponsor verify at least one of the bugs of
each of there minions. As a packager myself I would actually
appreciate this, keeps everyone in the loop on little changes by