On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 23:06 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 12:23:02PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > note that this build doesn't have the fix for the mmap corruption problem
> > which got quite a bit of attention last week. I'll get a fixed build
> > up there soon, but in the meantime, tread carefully with this one.
> I've been working on a 2.6.19 update for FC6 over the last
> few weeks, and it's starting to feel 'almost ready'.
> Before I push this out to updates-testing though, I'd rather
> have a few people 'kick the tyres' to make sure there's
> nothing really silly wrong with these.
> There are still 1-2 bits that need some more tweaking/fixing that I
> already know about, but I'm blocking on other people to get those fixed.
> You can find them at http://people.redhat.com/davej/kernels/Fedora/FC6/
> Notable points:
> - The big difference here vs the 2.6.19 that briefly showed up
> in rawhide is that this kernel sticks with the older IDE code
> (so you won't get a nasty surprise when your /dev/hda becomes sda etc).
> I just don't feel comfortable pushing that as an update without
> worrying about regressions.
> - Another notable change in this update:
> The addition of -debug kernels. All the slowdowns and nasty dmesg-filling
> debug output you've come to expect in a rawhide kernel, but in FC6!
> Well, hopefully not too many of the nasty messages, but this is the
> same as the other FC6 kernels, but with lockdep, slab debug etc turned on
> which should prove to be useful for tracking down some of the nastier
> bugs we've had in recent times. The slow-down from these kernels
> isn't really *that* bad on most workloads, I tend to run with these turned
> on all the time, and don't notice the difference (but Santa sometimes brings
> me shinier computers than others so this may not be universally true).
> - 2.6.19-1.2888 and above are based on 188.8.131.52rc1 so have the fix for
> the nasty data corruption bug that turned up in some workloads.
> So, it's there, have it at, beat it up etc. It *should* be pretty solid,
> All being well, the current plan is to get a slightly improved version
> of this into updates-testing on Wednesday. I'll do an FC5 version
> on the flight to LCA and will get that built and pushed to fc5-updates-testing
> as soon as I get network connectivity in the land of wallabies, cork hats
> and `roos.
I am now having the same problems on my laptop that I experience when
using the netdev kernels. My prism54 wireless card won't get a dhcp
address using NetworkManager. If I manually ifup the wireless interface
it does work properly. How would you like bug reports for this kernel
put into bugzilla?
This might be more of a NetworkManager issue or timing problem. I
have the same problem with the current rawhide on a couple of
different laptops that are using the ipw2x00 drivers.