On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 03:29:23AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:30:28AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 10:48 AM Robbie Harwood <rharwood(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou(a)pingoured.fr> writes:
> >
> > > Here is what the vision we came to and that we would like to discuss:
> > >
> > > ○ Every changes to dist-git is done via pull-requests
> > > ○ Pull-requests are automatically tested
> > > ○ Every commit to dist-git (ie: PR merged) is automatically built in koji
> > > ○ Every build in koji results automatically in an update in bodhi
> > > ○ Every update in bodhi is automatically tested
> > > ○ If the tests pass, the update is automatically pushed to the repository
> >
> > I have a *lot* of objections to this workflow, but maybe it'd be better
> > to take a step back.
> >
> > Instead of trying to create a new workflow, why are you not starting
> > with defining what we have now? And if there are problems with it that
> > need to be addressed, what are they and why do they motivate these
> > changes to you?
> >
>
> I'd like to second this question.
> What are the problems with our current workflows?
> At the beginning of this message you said there were several packaging
> initiatives being worked on, but for those of us that didn't go to
> Flock, we don't know what those are.
There was a talk from Neil that has been linked to elsewhere in this thread
Oups, the talk was from Neal and Igor. Sorry for the typo there.
Pierre