On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 14:50 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Michael Cronenworth
<mike(a)cchtml.com
> wrote:
> On 01/25/2018 02:41 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > I think the -z defs change should be reverted. It breaks very
> > long-
> > standing expected behaviour of linkers and there's been no proper
> > justification for doing it.
>
>
> +1
>
> This should go through a Fedora Change workflow. I am unaware of a
> Fedora
> Change for this.
It did [1], and I'm fairly certain it was referenced on this thread
already too.
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS2291#Scope
2016-11-15 Fedora 25 Release
2017-02-28 Branch Fedora 26 from Rawhide (Rawhide becomes future F27)
2017-07-11 Fedora 26 Release
2017-08-15 Branch Fedora 27 from Rawhide (Rawhide becomes future F28)
2017-11-14 Fedora 27 Release
2018-02-20 Branch Fedora 28 from Rawhide (Rawhide becomes future F29)
Can we do branch more early ? (like Branch Fedora 27 , but not at same
time of EOL of previous release because I going crazy , every time I
rebuild something in rawhide it won't build because some new feature .
This -z breaks openv (on python2 module), clamav (I guess , kodi , and
god knows what more ...
This rawhide in open since 2017-08-15 , after 5 months , we decide add
this breaking feature , more gcc8 and his new lessons that abs(of
unsigned ) is redundant so we won't build it .
so +1 (-z defs change should be reverted)
--
Sérgio M. B.