You couldn't force voluntary contributors to anything as you could for example not be forced to contribute to the fedora project as well. So how should this work?


On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> wrote:


Am 10.02.2012 13:07, schrieb Josh Boyer:
> That is the definition of a product.  Fedora has never been a product.
> Fedora is a community driven distribution and as such has no central
> or overriding authority to tell people that volunteer their time to go do
> some specific thing they don't feel like doing.

and that is the root cause
nothing in life works without clear rules

if a distribution starts soemthing like systemd-transition or /usrmove
it needs clearly resposnibility and at least authority to make
sure that needed work is done or if a big amount of maintainers
does not needed changes to say "stop in this case we can not enforce
the change at all as long we have no way to make it lcean"

for me the switch from a redhat-controlled distribution to
a complelty community-one does not work, in times before this
change there was a party responsible for the coresystem

these days everybody and no one is responsible for anything
and "hope the needed work is done somehow from someone" will
not work forever





--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel