-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
El Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:04:29 -0400
Adam Jackson <ajax(a)redhat.com> escribió:
On 11/2/12 3:18 PM, Anthony Green wrote:
> Several months ago I attempted to upgrade libffi 3.0.10 to 3.0.11.
> The change was reverted because the soname change in this version of
> the library broke the build environment. I would still like to get
> 3.0.11 in Fedora. I don't anticipate any future ABI-breaking
> changes, and 3.0.12 will include additional ports like Aarch64,
> which is likely of interest to some Fedora developers. How do we
> coordinate a rebuild for dependent packages? Also, I assume this
> will have to wait 'til F18 is out (fine by me), but I'd like to deal
> with it early in the F19 cycle.
It looks like libffi is emitted into the minimal buildroot (rpm-build
-> pkg-config -> glib2 -> libffi), so during the transition we'll
need to build both sonames of libffi. It might be worth keeping a
compat-libffi around for a release or two anyway, the current soname
has a _long_ history.
I am right now building a compat-libffi package that has just the
old .so nothing to be built against. so expect that early this week
the .so of libffi will be bumped.
Dennis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlD0TvoACgkQkSxm47BaWfeWkwCeN3gJR5lfWjgPwWYjpFeN/KTl
5/8AoJ4JaVMRJct2RsSG57QVHHk5flET
=WBEh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----