On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 11:26 AM Felix Schwarz
<fschwarz(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
Am 19.05.19 um 17:23 schrieb Yaakov Selkowitz:
> Based on your example, yes:
>
>
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidel...
>
> "The License: field refers to the licenses of the contents of the
> *binary* rpm."
Thank you - somehow I missed that part.
Felix
Shouldn't that depend on the license? The source code is normally
contained in the SRPM. Would it make sense to segregate that source
code into a different package with a distinct license, if possible?