Debarshi Ray wrote:
It is interesting how you redefine the meaning of "First".
At the DevConf
you were blaming NetworkManager for breaking KDE when they changed API and
KDE could not keep up, while GNOME did.
We cannot push new versions of a library when the users of the library are
not ready for it yet (especially one of our release-blocking desktops).
So maybe we should just ship code right from the Git masters of all
upstreams?
No.
> I also don't think such
> huge batches can realistically be tested.
So piecemeal updates to random packages pushed out at random points in
time can be tested better?
Yes, of course! It's common QA knowledge that small isolated changes can be
tested much better than a huge batch of unrelated changes.
Kevin Kofler