On Wednesday, 03 April 2019 at 21:30, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 2:58 AM Dominik 'Rathann'
> On Thursday, 28 March 2019 at 17:30, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 4:12 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > This Change proposal is on hold.
> Too bad. As a long-time SecureBoot user, I was looking forward to being
> able to have encrypted /boot on Fedora.
I'm not sure if this has anything to do with why it's on hold, but
GRUB does not support LUKS2. And there are no TPM bindings supported
in LUKS1, but are in LUKS2. In order to get to full disk encryption
out of the box by default with automatic unlock (measured boot to
obtain the cryptographic key from the TPM), needs LUKS2. So in effect
that means we either need GRUB to support LUKS2, or settle on an
Well, why can't we have LUKS1-encrypted /boot and enter the encryption
password by hand? That's still better than unencrypted /boot.
| RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan