Actually it would be good if you could put this rfe into
bugzilla. That way I won't forgot about it: though I hope
to take a look at it before too long, it would be very good
to have a record of the changes there.
I will file it two days from now. Sorry that I don't have time at the
EH> I would like to remove /etc/skel/.zshrc
EH> because it is not expected that someone will install
EH> zsh before adding users. All it does is source
EH> /etc/profile, which I moved into /etc/zshrc.
Well, no there is a reason for that, see:
There is some good discussion there, but I am considering reopening that
bug to get some more ideas about the situation. I suppose the situation
is that redhat wants to give people the ability not to source in bash
/etc/bashrc, or /etc/profile, and allow them to not source in zsh
/etc/zshrc or /etc/profile. That sounds fair that the default .zshrc
can allow them to decide on whether to source the /etc/profile. But the
reason bash can get away with putting things in skel is that its
automatically installed before adduser root, right? zsh is likely to be
added after users are added, and therefore would not copy over the skel
.zshrc, right? Unless the rpm checks to see if each user has a
~/.zshrc, this may be a problem. This is why I thought sourcing
/etc/profile should be done in /etc/z*, but I suppose that doesn't give
the user a choice to not source /etc/profile. Maybe there is a solution
that would allow all of this to work together.