On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:55:51AM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 20:24 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> . The Fedora KDE Live CD is specifically crafted to showcase
> > KDE, whilst the Fedora Live CD is specifically crafted to put Fedora's best
> > foot forward in a reasonable usable desktop that will fit on a CD. Again, it
> > is not a "GNOME" LiveCD by any means. Many parts of it are not
gnome,
> > especially areas like the browser. A Fedora GNOME LiveCD could be crafted
> > that showcases a pure GNOME desktop, like the KDE LiveCD.
>
> I already told you. This reasoning is flawed. The KDE live cd is not one
> to showcase a "pure KDE desktop" just the GNOME live cd. It has Firefox
> as the default browser just like GNOME. It has dozens of GNOME
> components. It might even have Evolution.
Huh? Have you actually even tried the KDE live image? Default browser
is konqueror, default mail client is kmail, ... evolution and firefox
aren't even included.
I think many people will miss firefox. I know there might be space constraints,
but moving then to bigger images will be the only item we could do to generate
more generic images that a broader set of people can use.
Just look at the size of a default install, it has really grown pretty huge
over the years.
regards,
Florian La Roche