2010/7/1 Bruno Wolff III <bruno(a)wolff.to>:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:10:11 -0500,
Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> wrote:
>
> Another wrinkle here is both libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo existing in
> rawhide/repo. Shouldn't libjpeg get removed now? Doing so should help
> matters too.
If someone looks at that, they might also want to look at dropping 'man'
which is in a similar situation (obsoleted, but still hanging around).
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
libjpeg should be removed before mass-rebuild, because libjpeg-turbo
provides: libjpeg-6b-47, the current libjpeg in the repo provides
libjpeg-6b-46. I think there are no perfect solution for
renaming/splitting packages, we should fix those broken dependencies
finally instead of staying on workaround.
Chen Lei