On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 05:33:16PM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 22:53 +0100, Florian La Roche wrote:
> > no, I don't want to hear any bitching and moaning about this, that's
how
> > it is.
>
> At some point we should change this to only pull in as few packages as
> really needed, but that also comes with quite some calculation cost.
why isn't the way it's currently being done correct? We've gone round
and round on this and its always come down to how to handle globs of
commands.
Sometimes less is more. Why should a system be polluted with i386
packages, if the user does not need them?
> This should really be something where yum, up2date and smart
algorithms
> should work together and then implement the best solution available.
is up2date much of a concern anymore?
Is something scheduled as replacement for RHEL or XMLRPC? If there is
no XMLRPC support in any other depsolver up2date cannot die.
--
Axel.Thimm at
ATrpms.net