On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Jeff Pitman wrote:
On Sunday 21 November 2004 09:46, Per Bjornsson wrote:
> As far as I can tell there's no way to tell that the
> post-install scripts failed using RPM, so this really isn't up2date's
> fault, it's a limitation of rpm.
Any non-zero return code in scriptlets causes RPM to issue a statement
about it. When uninstalling, RPMs simply don't uninstall if the postun
scriptlets fail. I've not experimented with $?, but I would assume
up2date could fully detect these issues as long as the scriptlets
produce appropriate error returns.
Few people know this is functionality of the shell. See the -e option.
What is a problem though, is that rpm seldom allows you to see what
failed. Just like rpmbuild does not (from the return code) give you a clue
what happened and your only resort is to process the output :/
-- dag wieers, dag(a)wieers.com,
http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]