On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 14:58 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 16:45 -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> A compromise that does absolutely nothing, that is 0%, to address my
> concerns is productive how?
>
> Have the concerns of the person that sparked this whole thing become
> irrelevant at some point along the way?
>
> This thing has certainly spun far out of my control, and no longer even
> has much to do with what I wanted in the first place.
Unfortunately it wasn't just your needs we were trying to address in the
meeting.
Just sayin'. I'm sure not getting anything out of this so far.
Who's needs are we trying to address now? Do they have a name? It feels
like FESCo is trying to address the needs of two straw men at this
point.