2009/1/3 Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny(a)gmail.com>:
2009/1/2 Brian Pepple <bpepple(a)fedoraproject.org>:
> On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 18:36 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> Twenty reviews of small packages, which are trivial to review (or even
>> flawless to begin with because the packager is experienced!), or reviews
>> of package rename requests, may be less of an achievement than one review
>> of a big beast with dependencies, which has been waiting in the review
>> queue for many months and needed lots of work.
> Totally agree with you, but I don't think we have any way currently to
> differentiate the difficulty between reviews that we could extract into
> a report.
The number of comments the reviewer himself added to the review ticket
could give a hint on how to complicated the review was.
Sometime reviewer does not take a note of what he has tested [assuming
reporter has already done clever job] unless package fails that test.
So, number of comments are also not a good hint.