On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 05:02:41AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
>
>Whether it's "incorrectly" or not is up to the eye of the beholder,
>and FWIW README.distribution is serving neither side of the
>grammar. Or is this package really going to be used in a
>"distribution"? I'm quite sure it will be.
Distribution is just a off hand suggestion. Feel free to come up with a
better name like others have suggested.
How about README.Fedora?
--
Axel.Thimm at
ATrpms.net