On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 11:07 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> All of them. They're mostly modifications of existing pages.
I'm not
> quite sure how you get that they look the same, they're very different.
General note ... There are a few broken links on this page. I didn't
inspect *all* of them, but it looks like they will resolve once you've
moved the documents into their proposed locations. So probably not a
big deal, I can understand the desire to not change the links before and
after moving the pages into their final location.
Yeah, they'll work after the pages are all put live.
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/QA:SOP_nth_process_nth_draft is a proposed
new page which covers the whole nice-to-have review process much as the above proposed
page covers the blocker review process.
My first reaction looking at the proposed blocker and nth process SOP
pages was that they should be combined into a single page, since there
is a lot of duplicate document structure/format. But I can't think of
any good proposals to offer at the moment that make it better (not
worse). It seems you've already been down this route too.
Yeah, I went back and forth. If you make them one page some of the
phrasing gets very long and clunky and possibly hard to parse, I was
happier with it as two pages.
Perhaps a reflection on my visual learning habit, I've been
playing
around with some minor edits of the 2 previous wiki pages that make it a
bit easier for me to rapidly locate/grok information without too much
reading. Of course, let me know if the edits are too invasive or
detract from your intended message.
Thanks, I'll revert them all later ;)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net