Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 19:11 +0200, Miloslav Trmac wrote:
>Providing a real library (which can be empty and just require
>libgif.so.4) also solves the provides: (64bit) problems.
This feels a bit cleaner to me and thus would get my vote
How about we keep the versioned libungif symlink for runtime compat, but
remove libungif.so and libungif-devel provides so packages must build
against giflib-devel explicitly?
This would still require the if conditional for the libungif Provides,
but otherwise is correct.
Warren Togami
wtogami(a)redhat.com