2014-06-12 17:03 GMT+02:00 Rahul Sundaram <metherid@gmail.com>:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Jan Zelený  wrote:

We are on the same page, thanks for your input.

I don't think so.  You are clearly arguing for a temporary compatibility wrapper but eventually forcing everyone to use dnf as the command.  The other side is wanting yum to continue to remain the name for the command with yum-legacy for temporary transition.  In otherwords, dnf is an internal project name and doesn't need to be exposed to the user.

There are not only two sides :)  I don’t insist on dnf being a hidden “internal project name”; introducing new features (only?) under the dnf name is fine with me.  I do object to planning to unnecessarily break the yum commands for which we actually have compatibility.
    Mirek