2014-06-12 17:03 GMT+02:00 Rahul Sundaram <metherid(a)gmail.com>:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
>
> We are on the same page, thanks for your input.
>
I don't think so. You are clearly arguing for a temporary compatibility
wrapper but eventually forcing everyone to use dnf as the command. The
other side is wanting yum to continue to remain the name for the command
with yum-legacy for temporary transition. In otherwords, dnf is an
internal project name and doesn't need to be exposed to the user.
There are not only two sides :) I don’t insist on dnf being a hidden
“internal project name”; introducing new features (only?) under the dnf
name is fine with me. I do object to planning to unnecessarily break the
yum commands for which we actually have compatibility.
Mirek