sön 2011-06-05 klockan 15:30 +0200 skrev drago01:
2011/6/5 Alexander Boström <abo(a)root.snowtree.se>:
> [...]
> Consider a hypothetical bash-uncompletion which just blacklists tab
> completion in those cases where it doesn't make sense but never adds any
> new completion sources. Should that be installed by default? It would be
> rather small and light.
That's makes no sense at all ... as if saving a couple of hundred of
kb helps anything.
Any argument based on size here is rather pointless.
I agree. bash-completion is small enough.
Even if all it did was to get rid of bogus completions it would still
offer a better user experience at a small cost so it should be in the
default package set. Now it does more than that.
/abo