On 9 July 2013 10:57, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Miloslav Trmač <mitr@volny.cz> wrote:
> nnnOn Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik@redhat.com> wrote:
>> = Proposed System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ARM_as_Primary
> How many F19 packages currently fail to build (or are excluded but
> shouldn't be) on ARM?  How do we stand against the other items of
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Secondary_Architecture_Promotion_Requirements

At F-19 gold we were missing around 233 source packages out of around
13,500 total. These are broken down into a couple of groups:
- Non ARM packages (x86/PPC/s390)
- Languages not currerntly supported on ARM - eg D, a fpc and a few others
- Packages that have issues with their CFLAGS (and actually should be
fine if they used distro flags like they should)
- Random other problems.

I'm planning on going through these again and document the remaining packages.

How do we treat "Desktop" items where the package compiles fine but does not run well without external drivers (the GNOME on ARM conversation earlier ) Or am I misreading that conversation. 
Stephen J Smoogen.