On 09/11/2015 07:16 PM, Haïkel wrote:
2015-09-11 21:09 GMT+02:00 Josh Stone <jistone@redhat.com>:
> On 09/11/2015 10:35 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Actually, the opposite is true. RHEL has fewer limitations in this
>> space. Red Hat's layered projects ship a fair amount of bundled stuff.
>> This problem is entirely Fedora's. Fedora has far stricter rules than
>> RHEL in this regard.
>
> It helps that we have paid maintainers for RHEL.  Bundling is not as bad
> when there's some assurance that it won't stagnate.  But in general with
> unpaid community members, it's harder to be sure things will be actively
> maintained.
Keyword is *some*, there are packages in RHEL that are less maintained than
they are in Fedora.
I'd rather insist that RHEL has a smaller set of packages that makes
it easier that
most of them are better curated.

Right as well as most issues already have been found and fixed in Fedora long before those components enter RHEL.

JBG