On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:13:04 -0700
Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 2012-08-31 12:32, John.Florian(a)dart.biz wrote:
>> From: Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com>
>> I'd prefer to avoid a list... how about:
> >
> > "This site provides status only for services managed directly by
> Fedora
> > Infrastructure"
>
> That's short and simple and drives the point home clear enough, I
> think.
I preferred the list. The thing is, you can't assume everyone knows
what is and isn't managed by Infrastructure. This would just change
the question from 'why isn't Bugzilla listed?' to 'why isn't Bugzilla
listed? isn't it maintained by infrastructure?'
Then someone will ask about fedoraforum.
Then someone will ask about fedora.ru
Then someone will ask about the google+ fedora page...
Then someone will ask about their Fedora mirrors...
etc. The list could grow as long as the internet. ;)
How about:
This site is for the status of Fedora Infrastructure services. If you
don't see a service here, it's not something we manage or provide
status on. Contact that service for status information.
kevin