On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 11:35 -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote:
I was about to complain that people were clamoring for this without
hearing out my opinion for precisely the reason you just stated. I'm
less grumpy, so thank you for the consideration, Gawain. I really do
appreciate that.
No worries, I figured early on I wouldn't get far stepping on your
already overworked toes ;-)
- There is potential for a maintainer to accidentally or willingly
get
Fedora entangled into a legal battle for trademark violations by
including non-approved patches. I haven't looked at the changes made
but essentially if they differ from what I have published, which I'm
guessing they do, they need to be checked.
It is basically your FC7 SRPM and patch with a 's/firefox/firefox2/'
applied to the name of these files:
firefox.desktop
firefox.sh.in
firefox.1
And finally this patch.
--- mozilla/configure.in.firefox2 2006-10-22 11:10:26.000000000
+1000
+++ mozilla/configure.in 2006-10-22 11:10:58.000000000 +1000
@@ -4242,7 +4242,7 @@
;;
browser)
- MOZ_APP_NAME=firefox
+ MOZ_APP_NAME=firefox2
MOZ_APP_DISPLAYNAME=BonEcho
MOZ_XUL_APP=1
MOZ_PHOENIX=1
--- mozilla/configure.firefox2 2006-10-22 11:10:18.000000000 +1000
+++ mozilla/configure 2006-10-22 11:10:38.000000000 +1000
@@ -12915,7 +12915,7 @@
;;
browser)
- MOZ_APP_NAME=firefox
+ MOZ_APP_NAME=firefox2
MOZ_APP_DISPLAYNAME=BonEcho
MOZ_XUL_APP=1
MOZ_PHOENIX=1