On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 08:40:52AM -0500, John.Florian(a)dart.biz wrote:
I too would much prefer this approach. For somebody like me who
maintain company-private packages based on django, this affords more
flexibility. I realize it may always mean more packaging work to keep
several python-djangoXYs in the distro, but it makes for a less rigid
coupling between the OS and what framework version you need to use.
The issue with
this approach is, there is no upgrade, i.e. if your
fantasticApp-1.0 uses python-django15 and fantasticApp-1.1 requires
python-django16, you'd still have the older Django installed, which
will produce a conflict. Thus the upgrade will fail.
Matthias Runge <mrunge(a)matthias-runge.de>