On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 16:30 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 11:07 -0400, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> David Woodhouse wrote:
> > How about just building binutils, then the compiler, then some libraries?
>
> That would be great if it's possible. How is this going to work with
> only the headers supplied in binutils and gcc?
I believe it ought to go something like
binutils < gcc < glibc < libgcc
We might want to put libgcc into a separate package for the
cross-toolchain, unless we can _fake_ the presence of glibc.
As mentioned a dozen
of times before: Simply repackage the glibc binary
rpms into a sys-rooted environment (for those GCC's supporting it -
Older versions don't).
Ralf