On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> I am more concerned about the package maintenance level. At the
> package maintenance level, it does not make sense to patch against the
> upstream decision.
It does. If upstream arbitrarily refuses to support a use case we support,
that must be patched.
Now I don't think Fedora should be supporting "Secure" Boot in the first
place, but if it does, it needs to be distro-wide.
You mean like pulseaudio, which is still a horrid mess after 11(?)
releases? Sorry, I respectfully disagree.
Best,
Orcan