On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:38:41AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:35:20 +0200
Jakub Filak <jfilak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> a bugzilla ticket  requiring a better Bugzilla summary field text
> produced by abrt has been filed. Before I start changing the bug
> summary format I'd like to do a little survey:
> What would you like see in the bug summaries produced by abrt?
I actually disagree with the reporter of the bug.
I prefer to have the component name in the subject of the bug. It's
true that you can look this up by going to the bug on the web and that
it's in the initial email, but after that the context of update emails
is not there, so it's harder for me to know _which_ of the many abrt
bugs this is.
Please, fix/improve your email client UI. All bugzilla emails
contain all necessary information in email header:
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Component: util-linux <----- !
For example if you use mutt then all you need is to add
unignore X-Bugzilla-Product X-Bugzilla-Component
to your .muttrc.
It's pretty common that we don't have component name in BZ summary...
Karel Zak <kzak(a)redhat.com>