Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wednesday 06 September 2006 21:23, Jay Cliburn wrote:
> Elsewhere in this thread you wrote you'd entertain requests to keep it
> there even after xulrunner is released. What is the formal method for
> someone like me to make that request?
There isn't one. I hear your noise though (: We'll save the discussion for
when xulrunner shows up.
Even if we decide to keep the i386 firefox (and I think we should), we
still have the messy issue of dealing with two launchers. This is very
messy from a user friendliness perspective.
- Two browser launchers?
- How is xremote supposed to work? You can currently only run one arch
of the browser at a time.
- It is possible to run both archs with minor changes to the xremote
code, but this makes things even more confusing to the user.
Possible solutions... none of which are ideal.
- Ship only i386, as that is the only useful arch.
- Ship both, but hide the x86_64 launcher from users.
I've seen that Microsoft hasn't found a good solution to this problem
when I tried Windows AMD64 beta. Anyone know if they "solved" this in
the final release?
Warren Togami
wtogami(a)redhat.com