On Thursday, October 17, 2019 4:21:44 PM EDT Tom Hughes wrote:
On 17/10/2019 20:44, Steve Grubb wrote:
> I don't think __x86_64__ is defined as the program is aimed at eBPF in
> the
> kernel. In rawhide, we no longer have glibc-devel(x86-32) to allow this
> to
> resolve. However, I think that the assumption of not having __x86_64__
> defined means we are targeting i686 is wrong. What should I do? Do we not
> support eBPF programs on Fedora?
I can still see glibc-devel.i686 in rawhide which provides that.
In rawhide I got [1]:
No matching package to install: 'glibc-devel(x86-32)'
But on my local system, F30, it works fine.
As far as I know the 32 bit multilib packages aren't going away.
Hmm. I still wonder if the headers might need reworking to not assume 32 bit
if the target is bpf.
-Steve
[1] -
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2047/38352047/
mock_output.log